![]() Yes, aircraft carriers were the most influential ship class in the history of naval combat, which can be used as an argument for their inclusion. That argument is a bit of a double-edged sword, though. Originally posted by Jack:Carriers are in the game because they were the most historically significant warship and because people like to play them. The current dynamic just looks so dumb and approssimated to me. Shouldn't it be better for wargaming to implement the old rts style, where planes were limited? just to introduce a mild need for iq into the game? Once i heard one guy joking:"if carriers have unlimited planes then bbs should have unlimited regenerations" ![]() Tanking the planes could make sence, but since they regenerate, i feel like i am getting swarmed by mosquitos, they will still keep coming, no matter how many i kill, and after i am gone, they will still come for my teammates. Now let's face it, if you are playing as a battleship you can't do nothing against planes, you can't avoid incoming bombs and torpedoes simply because you lack the agility required to perform such actions, you simply press "o" and wait for your end with submitted acceptation knowing that nothing you do will change that. I recently realized that carriers have an unlimited amount of planes, that slowly regenerate costantly. ![]() Disclaimer: i have nothing against carrier players
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |